

11
National Health Profile 2018
Notes:
1.
The data pertaining to three sub-divisions Viz. Mao Maram, Paomata and Purul of Senapati district of Manipur were finalized after
release of PCA of Census 2011 and accordingly the figures for India and State of Manipur have been revised.
2.
For working out density of India and the State of Jammu & Kashmir, the entire area and population of those portions of Jammu &
Kashmir which are under illegal occupation of Pakistan and China have not been taken into account.
3.
For Census 2011, the population of “Others” has been clubbed with the “Males” for working out population, 0-6 population,
literates and relates rates and ratios.
4.
In working out ‘decadal variation’ and percentage decal variation’ for 1941-1951 & 1951-1961 of India and Nagaland State, the
population of Tuensang District for 1951(7.025) & the population of Tuensang (83,501) & Mon (50,774) districts for 1961 Census
have not been taken into account as the area was censused for the first time in 1951 and the same are not comparable.
5.
The 1981 Census could not be held owing to disturbed conditions prevailing in Assam. Hence the population figures for 1981 of
Assam have been worked out by ‘Interpolation’.
6.
The 1991 Census was not held in Jammu & Kashmir. Hence the population figures for 1991 of Jammu & Kashmir have been worked
out by ‘Interpolation’.
7.
The distribution of population of Pondicherry (Puducherry) by sex for 1901 (246,354), and 1931 (258,628) and 1941 (285,011) is
not available. The figures of India for these years are, therefore, exclusive of these population figures so far as distribution by sex
is concerned.
8.
Arunachal Pradesh was censused for the first time in 1961.
9.
In 1951, Tuensang was censused for the first time in 129.5 sq.kms of areas only. In 1961 censused areas of Tuensang District of
Nagaland was increased to 5356.1 sq.kms.
10.
Due to non-availability of census data the figures for the decades, from 1901 to 1951 have been estimated for the districts of
Kohima, Phek, Wokha, Zunheboto and Mokokchung of Nagaland. Estimation however could not be done for Tuensang and Mon as
they were not fully censused prior to 1961.
11.
As the sex break-up for the districts Sheopur, Morena, Bhind, Gwalior, Datia, Shivpuri, Guna, Ratlam, Ujjain, Shajapur, Dewas,
Jhabua, Dhar, Indore, West Nimar (Khargone), Barwani, Raigarh, Bhopal, Sehore and Raisen is not available for the year 1901.
Figures for males and females have been estimated for the year 1901 for Madhya Pradesh.
12.
One village Ramtapur (code No. 217 and 101 in 1951 and 1961 respectively) ofJukkal circle of Degulur taluka which was transferred
under the state Reorganisation Act, 1956 from Maharashtra to Andhra Pradesh, till continues in Nanded district of Maharashtra.
The population of this village has, however, been adjusted in Nizamabad district for the year 1901-1951.
13.
The names of Uttranchal and Pondicherry have changed to Uttarakhand and Puducherry respectively after Census 2001.”